Recep Adiyaman
Weekly Digest April 03, 2026 ยท 6 min read

Weekly Digest: Mar 30 - Apr 03, 2026

A curated summary of the top protein engineering and structure prediction signals from Mar 30 - Apr 03, 2026.

Share X LinkedIn
Protein Design Daily

Building something in Protein Design?

I love collaborating on new challenges. Let's build together.

Subscribe to Protein Design Digest

Daily curated signals from arXiv, PubMed, and BioRxiv.

๐Ÿงฌ Weekly Recap

Mar 30 - Apr 03, 2026

Missed a day? Here are the top research signals and tools from Monday to Friday, summarized in one place.


๐Ÿ† Top Signals of the Week

๐Ÿ—“๏ธ Friday, Apr 03

Evaluation of protein-RNA Docking Web Servers for Template-Free Docking and Comparison with the AlphaFold Server.

๐Ÿงฌ Abstract

Protein-RNA docking is a valuable tool for predicting the structures of protein-RNA complexes, which allow us to understand the structural basis for gene expression and regulation, thus facilitating drug development. Despite the development of several protein-RNA docking programs, the field remains relatively underdeveloped compared to protein-protein docking, and a systematic comparison of these programs in terms of accuracy and efficiency is still lacking. Recent advances in deep learning-based structure prediction, such as AlphaFold 3, offer a promising alternative for modeling protein-RNA complexes. Here, we have compiled a consolidated benchmark data set of 235 protein-RNA complexes (freely available at https://github.com/tanys-group/protein-rna-docking-benchmark), which were curated from PDB structures deposited up to July 2024, to assess the performance of five template-free docking web servers and the AlphaFold Server. Among the docking web servers, HDOCK performed the best, achieving success rates of 31.1% and 44.7% within the top 1 and top 5 predictions, respectively, as assessed by CAPRI (Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions) metrics. Although AlphaFold 3 outperformed all the docking web servers with an overall success rate of 87.0% in its top 5 predictions, it failed in nine cases where docking approaches succeeded and showed a markedly lower success rate of 40% for protein-RNA complexes outside its training set, comparable to that of HDOCK (35%). Our study provides valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of current protein-RNA docking servers and AlphaFold 3, offering practical guidance for selecting the appropriate tool for protein-RNA complex structure prediction. These results also suggest that hybrid approaches combining physics-based and machine learning methods hold significant promise for achieving higher prediction accuracy.

Why it matters: Critical for improving fold accuracy and reducing structural uncertainty in de novo design.


๐Ÿ“š All Papers & Quick Reads

๐Ÿ—“๏ธ Friday, Apr 03


๐Ÿ› ๏ธ Tools & Datasets

  • ๐Ÿ›  Tool: ChimeraX - Next-gen molecular visualization for large data sets.
  • ๐Ÿ›  Tool: AlphaFold2 - Deep learning system for high-accuracy protein structure prediction.
  • ๐Ÿ’พ Dataset: SCOPe - Curated structural classification of proteins for fold analysis.
  • ๐Ÿ’พ Dataset: Pfam - Protein families database with curated multiple sequence alignments.

๐Ÿค– AI in Research Recap


๐Ÿข Industry & Real-World Applications


๐Ÿ’ผ Jobs & Opportunities


๐Ÿ“… Events


Enjoyed this digest? Subscribe above to get these dailies in your inbox every morning.

BS HF DK